At work today, in the bookshop, I was updating the display in the popular science section. We have some books with striking covers at the moment, lots of stars and galaxies and bright lights on the front. Books that are asking questions not only about where life comes from, and where it goes, but also asking what does it all mean?
One of these books, about life and death and what might happen after, had a quote from atheist par excellence Richard Dawkins. He expressed how good it was that people were finally facing up to existential issues by using the answers science has to offer.
I was struck by the irony of being a person of religion recommending a book that Richard Dawkins commends.
If my experience of being a young Christian, and then an avowed atheist, and now a Buddhist priest, has taught me anything - it is that there is no final word on these questions of meaning, on these issues of life and death. What is important to me now is not having an answer that I can rest upon in moments of crisis, or that I can tweet to all my followers, but to try to live in the question.
One of these books, about life and death and what might happen after, had a quote from atheist par excellence Richard Dawkins. He expressed how good it was that people were finally facing up to existential issues by using the answers science has to offer.
I was struck by the irony of being a person of religion recommending a book that Richard Dawkins commends.
If my experience of being a young Christian, and then an avowed atheist, and now a Buddhist priest, has taught me anything - it is that there is no final word on these questions of meaning, on these issues of life and death. What is important to me now is not having an answer that I can rest upon in moments of crisis, or that I can tweet to all my followers, but to try to live in the question.



